-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Remove legacy correlate, dot, and multiply from backend #2183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove legacy correlate, dot, and multiply from backend #2183
Conversation
|
View rendered docs @ https://intelpython.github.io/dpnp/pull/2183/index.html |
0d6a4e0 to
9083eeb
Compare
c0f0457 to
46762fa
Compare
9083eeb to
8256472
Compare
46762fa to
2f51c9e
Compare
8256472 to
5f793ab
Compare
d64c029 to
fd2a20d
Compare
5f793ab to
2514037
Compare
e3feeef to
ca1b3ef
Compare
ca1b3ef to
7206e28
Compare
fbc94d0 to
fa3af10
Compare
Recent changes in DPC++ 2025.1 compiler broke DPNP compilation. It seems the legacy DPC++ compiler behavior was affected by introducing SYCL experimental extension for reduction properties. Since the compilation issue occurred for a backend function which will be removed once #2183 is merged, that PR proposes to temporary w/a the issue and to reuse the extension for reduction properties, which seems working.
Recent changes in DPC++ 2025.1 compiler broke DPNP compilation. It seems the legacy DPC++ compiler behavior was affected by introducing SYCL experimental extension for reduction properties. Since the compilation issue occurred for a backend function which will be removed once #2183 is merged, that PR proposes to temporary w/a the issue and to reuse the extension for reduction properties, which seems working. ed39ea7
Recent changes in DPC++ 2025.1 compiler broke DPNP compilation. It seems the legacy DPC++ compiler behavior was affected by introducing SYCL experimental extension for reduction properties. Since the compilation issue occurred for a backend function which will be removed once #2183 is merged, that PR proposes to temporary w/a the issue and to reuse the extension for reduction properties, which seems working.
fa3af10 to
70a7d8d
Compare
936870b to
be09e32
Compare
be09e32 to
91fd41f
Compare
7206e28 to
6d17c49
Compare
vtavana
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, @AlexanderKalistratov!
91fd41f to
943726f
Compare
AlexanderKalistratov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@antonwolfy Please re-review
antonwolfy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @AlexanderKalistratov LGTM!
Removing `dot` and `multiply` legacy implementations and related legacy utilities from backend as no longer needed. 44bb068
Removing
dotandmultiplyimplementations from backend as no longer needed.Depends on PR #2183